Iron Dome vs S-400
In this article, we will compare the Iron Dome and the S-400 missile defense systems.
Introduction
The Iron Dome and the S-400 are two prominent missile defense systems used by different countries around the world. While both systems serve the purpose of protecting against incoming missiles, they have significant differences in terms of capabilities, range, and deployment.
Difference between Iron Dome and S-400
| Feature | Iron Dome | S-400 |
|---|---|---|
| Origin | Israel | Russia |
| Range | Up to 70 kilometers | Up to 400 kilometers |
| Intercepts | Short-range rockets, artillery shells, and mortars | Aircraft, cruise missiles, and ballistic missiles |
| Number of Units Deployed | Around 10 | Over 150 |
| Cost | Approximately $50,000 per interceptor missile | Estimated to be over $1 million per missile |
| Effectiveness | Proven track record with significant success rate | Renowned system with advanced capabilities |
Conclusion
Both the Iron Dome and the S-400 are highly capable missile defense systems, but they vary in terms of range, intercept targets, and cost. The Iron Dome, developed by Israel, is primarily designed to intercept short-range rockets, artillery shells, and mortars. It has been successfully deployed in several conflicts. On the other hand, the S-400, developed by Russia, has a much longer range and the ability to intercept various types of threats, including aircraft, cruise missiles, and ballistic missiles. However, the S-400 is also considerably more expensive than the Iron Dome.
